DoubleList is clearly aggressively working to fill a certain void   2 comments

Image result for DoubleList

 

…And specifically the void caused by CraigsList’s Personals section being taken offline. This was done in reaction to the FOSTA SESTA law signed two years back. The two Gay Men who created DoubleList two years ago made the website as a spiritual successor to CraigsList Personals’ Casual Encounters sub-section specifically. For those who may not know, that sub section was used specifically to find people to have a sexual encounter with. Yes, these guys made a whole website only for that purpose. For free.

The irony of DoubleList is they clearly have strict guidelines. They are NOT messing around and they can’t if they don’t want to go to jail or be the first people to be sued under FOSTA. The site’s been online for almost two years now so clearly they are doing something right. Unlike CraigsList, the site is manned by actual people and not just scripting programs.

The Co-founders revealed in an interview most of the posts they’ve rejected were either obvious sex work or people being too profane. They want the site to be welcoming to those who are not sex addicts obviously. CraigsList’s Casual Encounters Section was a free for all. People could post whatever they wanted and get away with it on Casual Encounters. On DoubleList you not only can’t use certain words in an Ad title but you can’t include pics of private parts either. All posts are prescreened before they’re posted as well.

The Sex Work concern is part of why FOSTA came to be. The other concern is Sex Trafficking. While yes the overwhelming majority of those who used CraigsList Personals, Backpage and other websites for Sex Work (or free sexual encounters of course) are consentual, it’s also true some were not consentual. So, Congress was forced to take action to hold websites accountable for when people use their websites to commit a crime or in this case Sex Trafficking. DoubleList has promised stiff penalties for anyone who tries to circumvent the site’s filtering system for sex work.

I made an account with Double List two years back to check it out but after finding out the sole purpose of the website is to find a sexual encounter, I’m pretty disappointed. It had the potential to be so much more than that and it’s a shame to know that the website’s main purpose is just for people to find someone to have a sexual encounter with. If DoubleList promoted more than just sexual encounters, I think it would generate more traffic and acceptence overall.

Given the website just introduced three new sections–two of which are Sexually Explicit–I do think a Pay Wall will be coming. The site will need to come up with a way to keep teenagers and kids from accessing the site’s sexually explicit content and many kids have cellphones these days. I mention that because the site uses text verification to make an account. The website does emphasize common sense when arranging meetups. Mostly around personal safety and of course, safe sex.

I still can’t believe the site has no barriers in place to keep anyone from wandering in like I did. This would not have been possible 20 years ago even with CraigsList Personals. It would be more than fair to say DoubleList succeeded where Backpage, CraigsList Personals and even Ashley Madison all failed: They have succeeded in building an entire website where one can arrange sexual encounters for free AND normalized it. To me, this is one of those situations where having your way isn’t necessarily a good thing. Given today’s society is telling everyone they can do whatever they think or want, I expect worse to come.

 

 

If you have enjoyed this post or other posts I have made on this blog, please consider making a monetary donation via PayPal. Whatever amount you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

2 responses to “DoubleList is clearly aggressively working to fill a certain void

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Although I agree with most of your points you got the numbers part ass backwards when you claim that “the overwhelming majority”of the sex worker post on Craigslist and Backpage etc were non-consensual or human trafficking related, it’s actually the other way around the premise behind taking a Hardline on the issue had more to do with the fact that if it’s happening at all it needs to be addressed, but no, the overwhelming majority were very much consensual

    • Daaaaaamn that’s a rookie writing mistake I made no one else seems to have noticed =O

      I should’ve proof read that–and I’m about to fix it–but yeah the overwhelming majority of Sex Work in general is consentual. I can’t believe I messed that up since I was looking at various numbers when I wrote it. Of course neither of us are saying Sex Trafficking isn’t a problem is the U.S. The larger proble was the simple fact for too long, CraigsList hid behind the law that protected websites from being held liable for crimes committed by third parties (Members) who access the website. FOSTA Changed all that and CraigsList removed their Personals section almost immediately.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: